On a related question, which Mr. Szabo was alluding to, I have notes here that in 2008-09, based on what you have said, the finance department recommended $419 million, and the actual was $180 million. This was on the softwood lumber piece. In 2009-10, $429 million was recommended and was put in the main estimates, and the actual expenditure was $206 million. Then, last year, it was $479 million, and the actual expenditure will be around $200 million.
Does CRA not have a responsibility to push back and say that these are your budgets and they're putting in estimates that obviously haven't been accurate? Today, with supplementary estimates (C), you can come here and say you're asking for a reduction, but in my view, it's because of poor estimating in the main estimates over not just the last year, but over three years.
What is the department's responsibility to say that “this isn't accurate and we're not putting it in our mains as part of our responsibility”?