I can't comment on the Earl Jones case. However, if that kind of case arose, we would obviously rely on the reports we received from the financial institutions.
A bank that detects that kind of conduct on the part of a client is obliged to send us suspicious transaction reports when it determines that it has reasonable grounds to think that transactions are connected with money laundering. When we receive that information, we put it together, and if we reach the disclosure threshold required by the legislation, we have to share it with the police—I'm describing what happens generally. If those requirements are met, we have to disclose the information.