The change simply occurred on February 14 of this year.
Determining is a much stricter interpretation in law than reasonable grounds to suspect. It is the combination of the July change in the legislation making tax evasion a predicate offence combined with the February 14 change in the act to a lower threshold. Together this will allow us to identify exclusively money laundering cases related to tax evasion. We'll be able to refer those to the CRA, as opposed to prior to last July when the regulations made tax evasion a predicate offence.
Prior to February 14, where, to make it simple, the cases we were referring to the CRA were cases that first identified drugs or fraud, etc., we could not exclusively refer to the CRA cases that were exclusively tax evasion. We had to refer to them cases that included it—for instance, money laundering cases that involved drugs, fraud, or some other predicate offence.
I don't know if I'm making myself clear.