If I assume that Mr. White's answer to be that he might have "tailored" his responses, as he just said, I think, personally, that even the in camera sessions are held in the presence of staff and a lot of people. If it is only because of that, I prefer that the session remain public. In the event that there were really things that he thinks he could tell us in camera, we could make a decision on that later. But for now, the presentation was relatively factual and I don't think there is any reason to change the general rule of Parliament, which is openness.
On March 8th, 2011. See this statement in context.