Yes, of course.
I think there's a long tradition of secrecy of tax information, and there are reasons for it. Tax administration in my country and in many countries depends on achieving a certain level of willingness of the taxpayer to comply with the laws, and it is thought that if secrecy were breached broadly, that would be a deterrent to appropriate compliance.
We had a blip of discussion of whether that kind of thinking was equally true at the corporate level as at the individual level. That came about I would guess about ten years ago. I haven't seen anything on it in quite a while.
My own judgment is that there is probably something to be said for a serious examination at the corporate level, and perhaps at the trust level as well, to making more information publicly available. I think I would be not at all confident that doing that at the individual level would be.... Although it might be equally desired, I think that might have more deleterious effects.
So I think you have to be careful because there are reasons for secrecy. Secrecy didn't just originate for no reason whatsoever. There are tax administration reasons why we maintain secrecy of information generally, but I think they're applied more broadly than is probably necessary.