We are looking at this from different perspectives. The whole idea of Starbucks is that it's exciting, and all of a sudden it talks about tax fairness and so on.
What I think about, in the research that I talk about, is this. This can be applied to any OECD country, but when a Canadian company deploys a global strategy through a jurisdiction such as Barbados, doing so increases the tax base in Canada. The simple fact that the revenues generated by a Canadian company globally can be repatriated to Canada free of tax does not mean that there are no tax implications. When one of our financial institutions does business in Latin America or Asia and the money is repatriated through Barbados, all of a sudden dividends are higher, head office functions in Canada are higher—there is a much larger tax base.
Most people talking about the Starbucks example are taking a very narrow view of the issue and are not thinking of it holistically.