Just to be right up front, I'd say no. Certainly, we support what's been stated before, and you've heard time and time again that regular passing of technical amendments is important. But you have to realize that there are different circumstances, and to put undue pressure on something to just pass it or not have it passed might in fact cause greater delays or problems. We see the issue of sunset clauses in the U.S. and some of their debates.
What has to happen here is just regular passing of the legislation. Sometimes there are unusual circumstances that require greater consideration, but certainly regular passage is what we think is appropriate, not a forced sunset clause.