Thank you for your question.
I would just suggest, with respect to proposed section 56.4, that everyone, now that it's been through three or four iterations, knows what it stipulates.
The one area that perhaps could be looked at anew in the future is the problem—all of this derives from the Fortino situation—that if you have a company whose assets are being sold, and it's a family holding company and the non-compete is for only one of the members of it, the provisions really don't work that well. It's not the same as if the individual who gave it was also the principal shareholder. I would suggest that this is one area that in the future could be looked at.