Sure. I'll take the last question first.
The two reports you're referring to are, first, the 2009 Senate Subcommittee on Cities report, a subcommittee chaired by Senator Eggleton and Senator Segal. They spent several years looking at the problem of poverty and the role of the federal government and came up with a very in-depth report, with many recommendations that get into many thematic areas around housing and income security, and so forth.
Second, the House of Commons report of 2010 was quite similar. Basically a House committee also looked at the federal role and came up with what I think is the most significant House report on this issue ever produced.
In response to both of those reports, the government essentially said, “Thank you for this work. We'll take these recommendations under advisement.” It has not in fact acted on any of those recommendations, to my awareness.
I think the key recommendation coming from both is essentially that the government needs to have a comprehensive plan, because the complexity of this issue demands that you not focus on one or two thematic areas but in fact go after a wide range of things needing attention.
In a few seconds I can't really summarize much more than that, but that, to me, is the key recommendation. It is still out there. Many groups are calling for a comprehensive approach to this issue, with the federal government playing a leadership role in partnership with provinces, territories, municipalities, aboriginal groups, and the NGOs that are standing ready to assist with that process. A great deal of thought has gone into this already and we don't need any more study; we can simply move.
What was your first question again, please?