You mentioned it. We always hold the Nordic countries up as the model of this, particularly in the early childhood area or in the facilities for child care.
I think there are two issues. One is giving the kids a good start in life and the other is giving the parents, particularly mothers, an opportunity to work. So investing at that level serves a dual purpose.
The interesting thing about Canada is that we score quite highly, as you know, in OECD rankings on our education systems. There is some variation across the provinces, but we do quite well.
I think the concern for us is maintaining that edge and making sure we do not let our institutions atrophy while this is happening. One of the things we need to do, I would argue, is make sure the whole population keeps engaged with those institutions.
I think one of the key differences between us and the U.S. is the rich, the plutocrats that Chrystia Freeland talks about, have disengaged. There isn't a public health system, but they have also disengaged from public education, so they are not invested in those things.