We have concerns about this motion. Effectively, it imposes a de facto time allocation, which we believe is inconsistent with parliamentary engagement, or the traditions of that. Perhaps the government would support a constructive amendment, and that is to add to (a) the following:
(vi) the Standing Committee on International Trade, clauses 62 to 103;
(vii) the Standing Committee on Transport Infrastructure and Communities, clauses 200 to 212 and clause 233; and
(viii) the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, clauses 213 to 224.
We suspect the government may find this agreeable.
The other amendment I would propose would be to delete (d) through (g), which I suspect the government may find less agreeable.