You yourself have referred to the Supreme Court of Canada's decision of December 2011 that says the federal government has a role in securities regulation regarding matters of genuine national importance and scope, including maintaining the integrity and stability of the financial system, preserving fair, efficient, and competitive national capital markets, and preventing and responding to systemic risks such as those posed by over-the-counter derivatives. You yourself have acknowledged that. How can you then object to the federal government proposing legislation to carry out those very responsibilities that the Supreme Court says are within the federal jurisdiction?
On May 22nd, 2013. See this statement in context.