Very briefly, the reason we suggested the amendment was that there was a possibility that, for example, the information provided on the disability certificate—where, if the bill passes, there would be an advisory, for example, to individuals about there being a maximum, so there would be consumer awareness, if you wish—and some of the other information that might be provided might not be available to us to use, to do some analysis, to see whether or not a firm would be exceeding the cap.
So this only makes sure that this couldn't be used as a barrier to really get around the intent of the legislation. It has nothing to do with information sharing beyond the CRA, or to other agencies or departments. It's really just to allow us to administer the bill in the manner that we thought was intended when it was created.
I'd say it's a very subtle technical change.