Yes, lives will very definitely be lost. There will be significant injuries. When looking at the injuries and the extent of those injuries, there may well be an argument to offset a number of these costs.
I can't answer the question on whether the FCM included this piece in the infrastructure deficit. I suspect it did not, in the sense that the FCM looked more at urban issues.
Where the infrastructure was failing, the highway department in the province of British Columbia at times did not think of it as failing, and they would argue against it. It's a 60-year-old road. Quite frankly, you can put your hand through the steel on some of those bridges. I would suggest that replacing the bridges would be maintenance, but it doesn't improve the highway standards suitably for us.