Jim already mentioned in his presentation that the Bank of Canada has been a little more flexible than simply the inflation target in a reality. If you look at what they did, for instance, in April 2009 all the way to June 2010, where they pegged the overnight rate at the lowest possible level and left it there, that would suggest that maybe they were very concerned about the crisis at that time and acted appropriately, I would say, in this case, just as the Federal Reserve is doing right now. So in fact, even though they don't have that as an actual mandate in their function and they only look at the inflation rate, in reality they do look at others.
To suggest also that somehow we cannot define full employment or any sort of high level of employment is absurd, not only because we also have a problem with inflation, but the central bank has been concerned with the NAIRU over the last 20 years, you could argue, or with potential GDP growth. That is a similar problem.