Evidence of meeting #3 for Finance in the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was cmhc.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Finn Poschmann  Vice-President, Research, C.D. Howe Institute
Jane Londerville  Interim Chair and Associate Professor, College of Management and Economics, University of Guelph, As an Individual
Karen Kinsley  President, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation
Cindy Bell  Executive Vice-President, Corporate Development, Genome Canada
Sean Keenan  Acting Director, Personal Income Tax Division, Department of Finance
Sonia Beaulieu  Law Branch, Tax Counsel Division, Department of Finance
Jane Pearse  Director, Financial Institutions Division, Department of Finance
Ling Wang  Executive Advisor, Financial Sector Policy Branch, Department of Finance
Peter O'Callaghan  Senior Analyst, Office of the Comptroller General, Treasury Board
Doug Nevison  Director, Fiscal Policy Division, Economic and Fiscal Policy Branch, Department of Finance
Stefan Matiation  Senior Privy Council Officer, Machinery of Government, Privy Council Office

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Mark Adler Conservative York Centre, ON

There's been a huge return on investment, in other words.

11:25 a.m.

Executive Vice-President, Corporate Development, Genome Canada

Dr. Cindy Bell

Yes, definitely.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Mark Adler Conservative York Centre, ON

It's money well worth spending.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Rajotte

You have one minute left.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Mark Adler Conservative York Centre, ON

In terms of commercialization to reach that point, does Genome Canada get involved in venture capital funding at all, or attracting it, or anything to that effect?

11:25 a.m.

Executive Vice-President, Corporate Development, Genome Canada

Dr. Cindy Bell

No. That is not our role. However, what we do try to do is ensure that linkages are made. We have a memorandum of understanding with the Business Development Bank of Canada to try to identify projects that would be of interest to them, for example.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Mark Adler Conservative York Centre, ON

Thank you.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Rajotte

Thank you, Mr. Adler.

We'll go to Mr. Jean, please.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

Thank you, Mr. Chair, and thank you to the witnesses today.

I have three questions. The first has to do with CMHC. Of course, the Canadian taxpayers underwrite CMHC and the risks associated with it. Based upon the evidence given and the history of this file, CMHC in particular, there's a very low default rate based on the return on investment to taxpayers. Is that correct?

11:25 a.m.

President, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

The increase from $200 million to $300 million, as suggested by Mr. Marston, actually will not increase the percentage of risk to the taxpayers at all. Is that fair to say? You've got an increase in the amount of capital that you can lend, but it's not going to increase the percentage of risk to taxpayers.

11:25 a.m.

President, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation

Karen Kinsley

This is the increase for private insurers you're speaking of? You're asking...I'm sorry.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

Will it increase any risk to taxpayers on a percentage basis?

11:25 a.m.

President, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation

Karen Kinsley

I think to the extent it's reflective of the growth in the overall mortgage market and the fact that any borrower who puts down less than a 20% downpayment needs to be insured...I would say whether it's insured by the private insurer or ourselves, the risk would be the same.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

Exactly.

My second question is in relation to the private mortgage market and the amount of CMHC's involvement: $500 billion. In essence, that would suggest that the private mortgage market would be about $150 billion to $160 billion. Is that fair to say?

11:25 a.m.

President, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation

Karen Kinsley

We think it's about $200 billion.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

CMHC would be about 65%, then, in essence.

Not to quibble about that, is it fair to say that it's necessary for the private mortgage market to keep a 10% amount in a trust fund to in some way minimize the risk so that if there is a major catastrophe, they would be financially capable of meeting any kind of demand? Is that kept in a trust account? How is that money kept?

11:25 a.m.

President, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation

Karen Kinsley

This is an arrangement they would have with the Department of Finance. I wouldn't be privy to those details.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

Mr. Poschmann.

11:25 a.m.

Vice-President, Research, C.D. Howe Institute

Finn Poschmann

My understanding is that 10% to 10.5% of premiums are set aside. They are expensable for the insurance company, but they're set aside in their own account.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

Is it a trust account? What kind of account is it?

June 20th, 2011 / 11:25 a.m.

Vice-President, Research, C.D. Howe Institute

Finn Poschmann

I don't know the details.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

What amount would that be? Would that be $15 billion, in essence? Or is it the amount of the premium?

11:25 a.m.

Vice-President, Research, C.D. Howe Institute

Finn Poschmann

You're talking about a percentage of the premium written each year.

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

Can anybody do a calculation on that? Is it $22 million or $23 million?