I would like some clarification. If there's been good work done on the tax evasion issue, I think we'd all agree that it would make sense for us to capture that somehow, finish the study, and come out with recommendations. To me, it's a timing issue of how long it takes to capture that information.
If the government side believes it's urgent to move forward on the charity issue, then how long a study is that likely to be? Is it something that's fairly short and focused? Could we get it done and then do the tax evasion piece, or is the tax evasion piece at a point where we should finish it off? The charity study is long and involved. It'll require committee visits across the country.
I'd like to get a sense of how those pieces can work together. Our side is not opposed to doing a study on charities, and I don't sense opposition to finishing the tax evasion studies. The question is how we fit them together.