Wouldn't it be wise, if you were talking about pensions for Canadians, to say you've got the Canada Pension as one option, you've got OAS, you've got GIS, and now you're going to have PRPP as a fourth option? Wouldn't that be a wiser way to spread out that risk, rather than putting everything in the bag of the Canada Pension Plan?
On March 1st, 2012. See this statement in context.