I was just going to comment on this.
I think it's a very normal process in most of the bills that I've seen before other committees, but to suggest that there shouldn't be allowed to be some exemptions relating to the better purpose of the act—to allow exemptions and particular purposes that would help the employees more and so protect them, even more so in particular circumstances that were brought up earlier—would go against what we're trying to do as legislators.
But also, to go against the very spirit and purpose of the act would not be allowed under regulation anyway. So I think this is quite normal.