Mr. Chair, I think the government has indicated that it's prepared to move sooner than five years where needed, and we would hope that this could be done sooner than five years, but as I say, we respect that this is a technical bill. But we think this really needs to be looked at, especially with a government that's interested in removing red tape and unnecessary duplication in cost.
We think this is an area where there is unnecessary duplication in cost—the cost to the federal government—and we think it needs to be looked at closely. There are issues of transition if these provisions are to be repealed, but yes, we support the enactment of this bill, but a message from this committee suggesting that 427 should be looked at would be very constructive and helpful.