I can take a stab at it.
As Ms. Glover mentioned, the wording of this section is consistent with other parts of the statute, and it draws from various other pieces of legislation, so it offers some consistency.
I would point out, too, that the wording of the legislation is “take into account all matters that he or she considers relevant”. This list is not exhaustive, and there is nothing that precludes the minister from taking other matters into consideration, depending on the particulars of the transaction that is before him.
These tend to be very complex deals. They each tend to bring many unique considerations forward. Giving discretion and the ability to consider different things based on the particulars helps serve the public interest better.
I would also note in respect of proposed paragraph 468(5.1)(e), that a “written report of the Superintendent” is, as we discussed earlier, redundant because there would in fact be a written recommendation from the superintendent that would precede such an approval. So it is already built into the approvals framework.