Thank you, Madam Chair.
I'd like to say that I disagree with Ms. Glover. I find that what we heard today was very interesting and different from what we heard in the past. I agree with Ms. Glover, nonetheless, that what Mr. Patrick has brought forward in terms of mobile giving is new. Also, what Mr. Charters brought forward is pretty new. I read that they are also known as the Google of giving. We're talking mobile. We're talking about the Internet. So it's something that's very new. Also, what Ms. MacKenzie said about volunteerism, I think was very interesting.
I would remind Ms. Glover that the motion that was brought forward by your party was regarding tax incentives for charitable donations. So we have to talk about tax incentives, and what we've heard from most of the people who are talking about that issue is that the stretch tax credit is one way to go. We've heard also about other incentives. We have to remember that the focus of the study that you have brought forth was regarding tax incentives. That's why we have people here. It just happens that a lot of people agree with our position, which is to put forward the stretch tax credit. I'll just move forward on that one.
Mr. Charters, you said that government cuts end up on the backs of charities. Could you expand more on that in terms of which types of charities are now suffering or having more problems?