I understand, but the Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development said in the House not two hours ago that suitable employment will be employment in the same field as the job that was lost.
However, what you are now eliminating from the definition of employment that is not suitable does precisely the opposite of that. What is being eliminated is the ability of a person to refuse employment if it is not in the same occupation, with the penalty being that they lose their benefits.
What the minister said in the House just now and what we have before us in the bill are two entirely different things.