Tax shelter mechanisms are part of this, and there is a relationship potentially; if a tax shelter mechanism is abused, it can be considered money laundering. So in fact Ms. Nash is completely within her right to ask questions on something that is clearly a provision of part 1 of this bill. Tax shelters are part of part 1, and abuse of a tax shelter could be considered money laundering. Of course it's not from the opposition parties that the use of the term “money laundering” to describe Canada's environmental NGOs has emanated. That came from the government.
I just want to clarify and support Ms. Nash's position, respectfully.