The change was prompted by the fact that 60% of the claims are against crown corporations. And 60% of that 60% are claims against one crown corporation. They are largely tasked with dog bites, and very often the employer would want to pursue the homeowner rather than the federal government. There are administrative costs to our doing it and quite often it's a very small amount. So it's essentially to save money as part of the deficit reduction action plan. It's not an awful lot of money, but there are nonetheless some savings.
On May 17th, 2012. See this statement in context.