Colleagues, I think I can help you out here. I sat on the scrutiny of regulations committee, so I know how the process works. What happens is the legal.... It brings into a group of all parties made up of both the Senate and the House of Commons, and it will highlight issues that may or may not be a problem. It would make suggestions to have the department remedy a situation so that it would not be a problem.
So in this case, I would assume, it may or may not have been a problem, but they came back to the department and said change it so it's not a problem, guaranteed. So it's mainly housekeeping. It would have been internal legal, and then it would have been all parties that would have vetted it before we got back to this stage here.