Thank you very much. I am an economist and I have a master's degree from UQAM. So we can have a talk between economists on the Investment Canada Act.
Mr. Bergevin, we have a problem right now. The House of Commons has unanimously passed a motion asking us to review the Investment Canada Act and to clearly define what a net benefit means for Canada. In your presentation, you are trying to reverse the onus. You are asking the government to provide evidence that it is not a net benefit for Canada.
In your view, under what circumstances, would an investment be a net benefit for Canada? Are there circumstances that would enable the government to describe it in a way that could justify its decisions?