I think it's extremely appropriate, actually. I actually argued in an op-ed that it should go to 70—not 67—with a provision for those who are in very physically challenging jobs or an exception clause that will allow that.
More and more of us are in services. Even though the figure quoted says that 15% are in manufacturing, that's a very misleading figure. Most of the people in manufacturing are not on the assembly line. They are in finance, marketing, and dealer relations. If you had the true figure for services today, it's upwards of 90% or 95%.