Thank you, Chair.
This discussion is getting a little tedious. It would be nice if the members opposite would just, at the very minimum.... I can understand they don't want to read the entire bill, but at a bare minimum they should have at least read the legislative summary. A lot of their questions would have been answered in very clear and candid language.
I want to preface my comments by saying that, clearly, the Fair Wages and Hours of Labour Act is not working. If Mr. Martin is correct and his talk of labour pimps and these workers who go around building airports on a weekly basis is true, then clearly the current legislative regime is not working and must be replaced.
Clearly this act, Mr. Giles, serves no useful purpose at the current time. It doesn't really play a significant role in protecting workers. The cost and the administrative burden of the legislation is really difficult to justify. Could you just comment on that for me, please?