I guess we see it a little bit differently. I would argue that, yes, a leader has to lead, but leading in a vacuum can be challenging...and given that there were many very good recommendations from the task force report.
I want to ask one last question. Literacy in numeracy amongst Canadians is not really that high. About 48% of Canadians struggle with practical levels of literacy. I notice that a few years ago, in 2006, the Conservative government cut $17.7 million from adult literacy programs. This seems to be a change in direction.
Can you explain now why this is a new direction that seems to be different from the old direction?