My feeling is that it's not going to matter so much for what we outline as the responsibilities in what this individual will do as it will for who that individual is. For most of the things you would hope for, if that individual is the right person, that individual I think will by nature do what needs to be done. Even if you stipulate what they should do, if you pick the wrong person, it won't guarantee that it will be done.
I think there are some guidelines and directions you could provide, but again, I think if the attitude of that leader is to look outward, if it is to consult and to engage, that leader will quickly determine some of the key parameters that should guide that vision and leadership.
In education, we always talk about how you do things being more important than what you do, because it doesn't matter what you do if how you do it brings pushback, doesn't bring engagement, and doesn't bring receptivity. If the leader is stipulated with a set of tasks to do but isn't the right person for the job, I don't think that will solve the issue. I think all of us would be delighted to work with the person who actually can handle that function in a national leadership way.