Ms. Ryan, I listened to your answer. It has to be understood that the leader in question will have to work with a variety of stakeholders and partners, be they federal, provincial or other.
The fact that a common definition of financial literacy doesn't necessarily exist might complicate things. Wouldn't it be more beneficial to have a definition to work with, one that would make partners aware of the basic principles and terms of reference they will have to follow?
What's more, when it comes to defining the leader's role during those initial meetings, isn't there a risk that an excessive amount of time will be spent coming up with a common definition of financial literacy, in turn undermining the work that could be done?