Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
The specific drafting is done to avoid confusion. Whenever you have a phrase that is in the passive language, such as “considered necessary” in the proposed amendment, it becomes very difficult to determine who considers it necessary. By what measure do you determine that it is “considered necessary”?
What you have identified as a subjective element I think, with respect, should be viewed in the context of the act as a whole and of this act. It is not that the financial literacy leader may consider one thing or the other necessary depending on a personal whim, but rather in accordance with the objects of the act itself.
It is a canon of executive action, whatever the executive, that the executive or the appointed person acts only in furtherance of the statutory instrument that grants the executive the authority to act. In this particular instance, the authorities and the objectives and everything are set out in this act and in the context of the FCAC Act as a whole, so when you have a phrase such as “he or she considers necessary”, it is considered necessary in those two contexts.