I'm very intrigued by the “charity+” concept. I'm just wondering about this. It has been broached by a number of the other questioners. In terms of selecting the particular charities that would be beneficiaries of a charity+ concept, we can identify certain charities ahead of time, but then there are those instances that occur—earthquakes, tsunamis—that are unforeseen. Would not those charities be at a distinct disadvantage to those that are in the charity+ regime?
These are charities that would be outside the charity+ regime and that may indeed be more immediate in terms of need and maybe more worthy at that particular time, but because there are acts of nature that we could not anticipate, could that not be a problem with charity+? I'd just like you to explain that. Maybe I'm wrong.