Sure, and I think this is why organizations such as Imagine Canada would not endorse this—because they represent all charitable organizations, whereas this would recognize certain activities as being more worthy of tax dollars than others.
So it is a difficult issue, but it is being done elsewhere, and I think by default it's being done in Canada. For example, there is the matching credit program, as I said, for disasters, or at the provincial level, as in the U.K., matching contributions to institutions of higher education, where those are being rewarded.
So yes, but in addition, though, that's why I'm suggesting not to deny any organization its existing tax credit, but rather to top up for certain ones that perhaps deserve more, and cap the contributions that would be eligible for it, so that there would not be a flight of contributions to the more privileged ones. That is consistent with the practices in other countries.