If there was trying to be a very fine designation of what particular activity was important, I could see that you might be denying creativity, inventiveness, or resourcefulness more widely seen. You might miss or stifle that creativity by funding one area.
What I am suggesting is really quite a broad-brushed area, hoping that different organizations will find different ways in which to attend to quite a broadly defined need. I don't see this as controlling or missing entrepreneurship or creativity, rather encouraging it, but in an area that the government sees as really most pressing—the needs that are most important.