If I may, one of our biggest concerns with the bill, and we have a few, is with respect to its extremely broad definition of labour trusts. We've already heard several times this afternoon that it includes a number of entities, which may or may not have been the intention of this bill. The way it's drafted, it includes pension funds that have any unionized members, health and welfare trusts, supplementary unemployment insurance benefits, training funds, etc. Taken in its black-and-white wording, it would also include provincial workers' compensation funds, because they have unionized members in them.
It's clear that to address these issues, the bill would have to be significantly revamped and redrafted. It's for that reason that the CBA, rather than suggesting specific amendments, has suggested that the bill not be passed.