To Mr. Jean's point, I know that what our party was calling for—and I believe the NDP was as well—is actually dividing up the bill, not just for study at committee but ultimately for other relevant committees to do a clause-by-clause study and vote on it, as we believe it ought to be. I just wanted to clarify that it's not that we're not taking “yes” for an answer; this is actually far less than what we were seeking in terms of parliamentary scrutiny.
On October 31st, 2012. See this statement in context.