In our view, the best way to amend it is to simply remove it from the definition. Our view is that it will, as I say, engulf a number of entities. As I mentioned in my opening remarks, it's quite possible that some charities may get covered by this because of the ability, say, of a union to appoint a member to the board of the charity. Is that an intended consequence of this legislation? I'm not that sure that it is.
