In our view, the best way to amend it is to simply remove it from the definition. Our view is that it will, as I say, engulf a number of entities. As I mentioned in my opening remarks, it's quite possible that some charities may get covered by this because of the ability, say, of a union to appoint a member to the board of the charity. Is that an intended consequence of this legislation? I'm not that sure that it is.
On November 7th, 2012. See this statement in context.