It's on Mr. Adler's point of order.
I think my colleague mentioned that initially, when he spoke about the costs. What he's doing right now....
What my colleague is doing now is really talking about all the consequences that this has and about the direct connection with costs. My colleague mentioned the costs that CRA mentioned. He also mentioned the problems the Canadian Bar Association raised with respect to costs. I am listening to my colleague and he is still talking about all the costs associated with the implementation of this bill.
Consequently, he is simply explaining all the connections with costs and the increase that represents. The connection is made. We have it in the introduction. We can still see it, and I believe he has not finished because many costs will have an impact.
I remind my colleague that, when we arrived here today, it was after receiving the report that the Canada Revenue Agency had provided. This is a report that we received before arriving here today. So it is normal for my colleague to continue talking about the implications of those costs.
I would also emphasize another point. It was mentioned in the House that you are a very good chair. I know you are fair. I know that you have always had the kindness in this committee to listen to the views we had to express and that you have always been prepared to accept comments from both sides.
Consequently, I thank you and I expect you will continue to proceed in the same manner and to manage this committee as you usually do.