With respect to your point of order, Mr. Adler, as you know and as I've mentioned before and as has been defined by many speakers, relevance is defined very broadly. Further to that, the motion itself is fairly broad:
That this Committee, pursuant to S. O. 97.1, recommends that the House of Commons do not proceed further with Bill C-377, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (requirements for labour organizations), in order to protect the integrity of the government's budget framework.
That is a very broad motion. It's very difficult for me, as the chair. I would say that Mr. Boulerice may be testing the bounds of relevance, but I can't declare any of his comments not relevant.
We'll go back to Monsieur Boulerice, s'il vous plaƮt.