The point is that I don't have the authority to stop it. I would make a helpful suggestion, as the chair, that we could deal with clause-by-clause consideration. We could deal with the amendments. Members can vote yea or nay on the amendments and yea or nay on the bill, and the arguments can be made within the context of the clauses within limits, but it's up to members opposite. It is their right to speak to this motion. Obviously, if the first speaker agreed to the request by Ms. McLeod, then Monsieur Mai, Mr. Marston, Mr. Martin, and Ms. Glover would have to agree to that request as well.
Does that clarify matters?