I want to thank all of you for your input.
My understanding of what Mr. Hiebert was doing was that he was recommending, similar to Ms. McLeod, that we proceed to clause-by-clause consideration, that we proceed to the amendments, because that is where the members of the committee can argue over whether the amendments address the concerns raised by Monsieur Boulerice.
Again, it's a recommendation. Mr. Marston is correct that procedurally we can't move there unless all the members who are on the speaking list consent to move there. Mr. Boulerice has the right to the floor under the motion and under the standing order that Mr. Marston raised.
It was my hope to deal with the clauses in the bill today, but it looks as though we are quickly running out of time. That's my ruling on the point of order.
Mr. Hiebert, Monsieur Boulerice has the floor, and other members are on the list. Unless they consent to do so, we will not proceed to clause-by-clause consideration of the bill.
Monsieur Mai, do you want to raise the issue of the CRA? You indicated in your previous comments that you did.