I will now ask Mr. Berg a question, but I would also like Ms. Christians and Mr. Pigeon to comment afterwards.
Mr. Berg, the argument used by the government to convince us to finally implement the agreement is that we would have FATCA anyway and, therefore, the current intergovernmental agreement should be adopted as is.
Do you feel this argument is logical and acceptable, or should the government be able to explore certain modifications before confirming the agreement?