That's why we signed the IGA.
I would like to go to Mr. Reed with my next question. One of the sections of annex 1 of the BIA says the following, in terms of reporting:
4. Notwithstanding a finding of U.S. indicia under subparagraph B(1) of this section,
It then says:
a) Where the Account Holder information unambiguously indicates a U.S. place of birth, the Reporting [FATCA Partner] Financial Institution obtains, or has previously reviewed and maintains a record of: (1) A self-certification that the Account Holder is neither a U.S. citizen nor a U.S. resident for tax purposes(2) A non-U.S. passport or other government-issued identification evidencing the Account Holder’s citizenship or nationality(3) A copy of the Account Holder’s Certificate of Loss of Nationality of the United States or a reasonable explanation of:
Are there ways, for instance, that a Canadian who may have been born in the State of Maine, for example, and was only born there by accident at birth, as their mother had to go there because it was the only hospital that was open—in respect of the filing in the U.S.—can get out from underneath this compliance reporting?