What we're talking about here will get us a long way towards resolving that problem with our neighbours around the world, quite frankly, but particularly with the United States.
In terms of the second part of this, when there is an insolvency, it is a trade irritant. I will say that. It is beyond the scope of the amendments we're talking about here today.
The trade irritant is the fact that since 1984 Canadian sellers have been able to go into the United States and they're treated exactly the same way as U.S. firms are. So when there's a bankruptcy—and I want to stress that there's a very limited trust, because there has been a lot of miscommunication about that—what it really does is trace the accounts receivable through. So if the buyer goes bankrupt and he takes your potatoes and sells your potatoes, they try to find that receivable from the potatoes and bring it back to you.
What we've accomplished here in pillar one will help, but without the trust or some similar tool that will help equate that, I think it will remain a trade irritant simply because Canadians are getting something for free.