Thank you.
The idea is simply that a suspicious transaction report happens when a financial institution or accountant gets to the point where they suspect the client they are dealing with is involved in money laundering or terrorist financing. There's a threshold they get to, and they describe in fair detail within the suspicious transaction report what they found suspicious, the basis of suspicion, and what they've done about it.
It also can reveal a fair bit about the mechanisms the institution used to detect the behaviour in the first place. In my view, having that information become public could be detrimental in a whole number of ways. In the U.S. we've seen lawsuits started by the subjects of the reports against the institutions that filed them.
I think there must be a mechanism to either summarize the information in the suspicious transaction report, or otherwise redact or anonymize it for the purposes of those proceedings.