I think we do, but certainly we don't want to interrupt the larger effort. We see Mr. Allen's amendment as an improvement. We're biased, so it's not as good as the one we wanted, and we wouldn't mind having that vote, if possible, but we don't want to sabotage the larger effort. So if that is what's at stake.... I didn't hear the entire advice that you got, Chair.
Perhaps we could move the NDP amendment, see it moved through, and if it's defeated, so be it. If that still allows Mr. Allen to move his amendment, then we're fine with that process to go ahead.
Does that work? I think that's the way we have to do it. Well, we could do it the other way, but we wouldn't mind seeing a vote on ours.