I understand what you're doing. You're doing your job, and you have explained the reasons and the motives behind that. I'm afraid we're moving toward a slippery slope where we are going to remove [Inaudible—Editor]. We're talking about car safety, for example. That logic can be applied to any type of regulation that government is going to propose, either this government or any future government.
This justification doesn't make sense to me. We're supposed to be broadcasting any change, or changes, in the regulations to the public at large; that's why we have a Canada Gazette. If we are starting to make exceptions and increasing the number of exceptions, because it's more expedient and because government knows how to reach those people who are directly impacted buy those regulations, then why bother to make these changes public?
In that sense, I am puzzled.
Monsieur Leclerc.