Chair, as a quick point, I would suggest that based on what we heard before, proposed subsection 265(5) is not passive; it is an active contact with the client, so we won't be supporting it.
Conservative
Mike Allen Conservative Tobique—Mactaquac, NB
Chair, as a quick point, I would suggest that based on what we heard before, proposed subsection 265(5) is not passive; it is an active contact with the client, so we won't be supporting it.
See context to find out what was said next.